Home Sport Good or bad idea: NBA expansion?

Good or bad idea: NBA expansion?


We are thrilled to have you on our site. If you enjoy the post you have just found kindly Share it with friends.

Good or bad idea: NBA expansion? | Sports news and news TooAthletic.com

Will the NBA run in the desert or the Pacific Northwest? These are the questions that the league’s owners are said to ask themselves because the talk about expanding the league had entered Commissioner Adam Silver’s mind. Many believe the move is a response to recent events, insofar as it benefits the league’s competitive balance and entertainment value. So, I ask you, do you think expanding the NBA is a good idea or a bad idea?

The NBA has an internal buzz Discussions about expanding the league They are considering putting up teams in Las Vegas and Seattle. The drivers behind the addition of two new teams, the first since 2004, are the estimated expansion fees of $ 2 billion that upcoming teams would need to pay NBA owners for the right to buy into their money-making venture. The fees, which are split, would be a great way for owners to “recover” some of the money they lost during the Covid-19 pandemic without increasing their pay cap.

For me, it is clear that money is the only important factor for the expansion of the NBA in the near future. This is because there are many reasons not to add two new teams.

First, the addition of two teams in the Western Hemisphere would do away with the ideal balance the two NBA conferences had with 15 teams each. Possible repercussions for this would be the relocation of teams like Minnesota and New Orleans from the West to the Eastern Conference.

Second, there is the divisional alignment problem, which sees in each conference three divisions with five teams each. While you may be able to convert two Western teams into Eastern teams, the days of having three divisions will come to an end, making the league likely to move into four divisions of eight teams.

Of course, another thing that will change for the worse is the schedule, a schedule that has already been toned down as it forces each team to play two matches against those in the opposite conference each season rather than those vying against for a tipping point. The new 32-team alignment process will likely continue to see those long coast-to-coast journeys for the teams; But only for a longer and possibly more frequent period because there will be more teams to play on those trips.

Then there are the issues of competitive balance and the talent pool. With so many players looking to form “Super Teams” with their friends, would two additional teams have a chance to build a competitive roster or even keep those players if their stars wanted to play with their friends elsewhere? How do we know that the new cities chosen to host the NBA team will be the destination rather than the starting point for the youth league stars when they become free agents? After all, Charlotte is already in her second team in the NBA after losing her first team to New Orleans, and Vancouver lost her team to Memphis when Western Canada proved unable to support the team.

There is a big difference between the need to expand and the desire to expand. Would having 30 more spots on the list in two other teams bring more talent to the NBA, or would it only allow a few second-team players to start elsewhere and be part of a losing franchise for a few years?

Money is good for NBA owners of course, and they still have to be seen, if any, they will need to share with existing players. In the end, however, adding more teams to a league that already sees a third of its teams as uncompetitive since the start of the season doesn’t sound like a great idea. But then again, it’s not supposed to be the case, because most money grabs are not the best ideas, they are only designed to make money for a small number of people.


Golden State Warriors - TooAthletic.comAbout TooAthletic
very Takes is the news section of TooAthletic. TooAthletic Takes launched in 2019, and they’re the source for all the sports you play. TooAthletic Takes will make you laugh, cry, get angry, and even call us “idiots”. We strive to give our readers another point of view on any sporting situation, and we look forward to disagreements with hopes that this will lead to healthy discussions and debates.

TooAthletic Takes aspires to be the # 1 source for all sports and to become a leader in sports media.


“What if” he takes

Boxing takes

Take a dumb sport

Either / or he takes

ESPN takes

Imaginary football takes

Fox Sports takes

Funny sport highlights

Take a funny sport

High school highlights


Memes and GIFs

Take MLB

Highlights of the NBA

NBA takes

NCAA Sports Highlights

NCAA takes

Highlights of the NFL

NFL takes

NHL takes


Takes the question

Take the race

Betting Picks Rafael’s NFL

He takes sports baccarat

Sports Film Review

sports news

Sports Quotes

Choices of Survivor Pool

It takes very sporty

UFC takes


Worried / Don’t worry about the takes

XFL takes

Good or bad idea: NBA expansion? | TooAthletic.com

the post Good or bad idea: NBA expansion? He first appeared Analgesics.

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed within this article are the personal opinions of the author. The facts and opinions appearing in the article do not reflect the views of Algulf.net and Algulf.net does not assume any responsibility or liability for the same.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here